The best answers are voted up and rise to the top. Stack Overflow for Teams — Collaborate and share knowledge with a private group. Create a free Team What is Teams? Learn more.
How can I safely use Tor without the "Browser bundle"? Ask Question. Asked 6 years ago. Active 2 years, 3 months ago. Viewed 15k times. Improve this question. Andrew Lott 2, 5 5 gold badges 26 26 silver badges 46 46 bronze badges. Add a comment. Active Oldest Votes. Under Cookies and Site Data , mark the Block cookies and site data option. Set Tracking Protection to Always.
This method reduces the chance of the original data being understood in transit and, more notably, conceals the routing of it. This download is licensed as freeware for the Windows bit and bit operating system on a laptop or desktop PC from vpn and proxy software without restrictions. Tor As an open source project, you are free to view the source code and distribute this software application freely.
The program was created by the developer as a freeware product, but donations for the continued development are highly appreciated. You may generally make a donation via the developer's main web site. Authorities can see your data usage and other things. For onion sites, Tor is a critical browser. It can connect you to random servers to encrypt your online traffic.
With random routing, you can enjoy a high degree of anonymity. See these essential points: Tor can hide the location of users through IP address concealment Tor is useful to prevent the traffic from being tracked en route Block the tracing of the internet activity. Numerous routing procedures keep the identity of users secure. Every node of the routing path Tor knows the IP address of an old node and the next node. Tor is free to download, but it has a bad reputation because of the dark web.
Criminal and online hackers use this browser for their illegal activities. Honest people often use this for their protection and privacy. Moreover, its use is common for onion sites. You can use Tor browser similar to Safari, Firefox or Chrome. Along with standard websites, it allows you to enter. It can effectively mask your location, but you will not get better safety and security without a VPN virtual private network. Try to use VPN and browser at the same time.
Yes, so? The size of the team involved seems an odd thing to bring up, as from a security point of view, the effect of team size is on the flavor of the possible vulnerabilities more than whether or not they exist. So people tend to make trust judgements from an emotional place rather than a technical one.
Not Mozilla, not Google, Microsoft or Apple. Is it someone who uses it 5 hours a week? What if they also use another browser for 6 hours a week? What if they have multiple computers with the same browser installed? What if they downloaded the browser and any updates only once, but then deployed it to thousands of computers in their corporate network, with all telemetry and update checks blocked? Even the number of downloads, which is something they do know for sure, can be enough to base your rough user numbers on.
Anonymous: true, not to mention those who install a browser, which the developer records, but then uninstalls the browser, which the developer does not record. Lots of people download software, try it, and decide not to use it, or never even try it. Lots of people download the same software more than once, etc.
As an aside: uMatrix. I have seen the question — uBlockOrigin or uMatrix or both — debated, and in the end R. Hill himself said there is no compelling reason to use uM if you use uBO. What you said applies to Waterfox too, and probably also to some other privacy-hardened browsers. About user interests and privacy, the Palemoon dev has also demonstrated hostility to a script blocking extension and an anti-advertisement extension. It is?? What do you mean exactly? As far as Pale Moon is concerned, the search engine deals help the developer pay his bills as he works on the browser as a full-time job, not simply as a hobby.
Users can of course opt out simply by not using the default Pale Moon Start Page which is set as the homepage for fresh browser installs. There is a subtle but important distinction between developing software to make money, and making money in order to keep developing software.
Developing a niche browser is not a path one pursues if his desire is to be rolling in cash. One pursues this path because one is passionate about a specific goal, which in this case is making a browser that is extremely customizable and versatile while adhering to open web standards more so than any other browser.
Google and previously Microsoft. The problem is when the business model is about making money from unethical software anti-features ads, spyware, DRM, other anti-user design choices dictated by whoever paid… and anti-privacy default search engines like Bing, Yahoo or Google.
The free software philosophy implicitly assumed that software freedom was enough to make such a business model impossible, as it was so cheap for developers to fork out the crap that nobody would use the original version. It was true for a time, but Mozilla and others have proved this assumption wrong nowadays, as business can always make theoretical freedoms nonexistent in practice, through many mechanisms.
Personally I believe that with time, Firefox is adding more privacy aggressions than protections by default, and a lot of them are not clearly visible but hidden in a thousand cuts of small technical changes. Of course it does make the browser more private. Is it? I hate what TBB v8 has done with UA spoofing, and I need my browser to easily spoof its user agent to mobile platforms on my daily browsing.
And question 1B; if Tor is the answer, what extra extensions or about;config settings should be added in order to further improve its privacy? My answer would be to add nothing, change nothing.
Who even cares about cookies etc. You have FPI first party isolation , and can change to a new Identity whenever you like. The only drawback I see, is that new Identities are only auto-created per session.
So if you wanted to isolate repeat visits within a session, you would need to manually change Identity. Most users will be at default. Pants: thanks for your feedback. I tried. This plus the inability to sufficiently modify the Firefox UI and the constant additions of features that I needed to worry about is why I abandoned Quantum. If you want to use Tor, then use the Tor Browser.
Because it uses the Tor protocol, it has advantages over Firefox. A vetted, even audited, VPN could effectively offer the same anonymity i. So with due diligence, I do not think this becomes a factor. In fact, MOST of it can. The differences really boil down to TB code patches bundled fonts, which actually reveal your OS , and the benefits of Tor e. OpSec is hard, but essential.
This can also possibly enable better security, because they enforce it, so if they disabled a media type, or a new API until they checked it out, everyone still looks the same. And Tor traffic would likely stick out. Although I definitely see issues here with first party repeat visits per Identity Identities are not changed every 10 minutes like they used to , and I think this is a bad move.
Just browse the web, visit the odd hidden service. It all depends on what your threat model or needs are. Pants: wow, that is quite a reply for just off the top of your head. Your points are mostly clear to a non-geek and my gut feel pointed me in the same direction, though for well-argued reasons. I have implemented a number of Ghacks user. Many thanks for al the work you and the team do on that.
Thank you for this big ass reply. As you said, a vetted, even audited, VPN service could effectively offer the same anonymity, and we can even chaining VPNs to enhance it furthermore.
By using the original Tor browser, we keep the same results of feature detection i. I think this case is worth of us to do more investigations. Thank you for your hard work.
May god take off his pants. Do not mix and match. When I mentioned OpSec, this was only half the equation. The full equation is that a browser has no control over BOTH end points. But since the experts say so, we take it. However I will switch to Chromium Portable soon, I tried Firefox 63 and among others I really hate the auto update notification. Looks like you can turn off the notification. Thanx Martin, very nice idea. In terms of local persistent data ghacks user.
But then Tor has issues too. You could actually take Tor and hardened it even more beyond the safest slider setting. First I made a general custom user-overrides. Learn more. Tor Browser Bundle for Windows without installer? Ask Question. Asked 7 years, 8 months ago.
Active 2 years, 3 months ago. Viewed 14k times. I can't find a non-installer download for the browser bundle for Windows anymore. Anyone know if you can still get a non-installer Tor Browser bundle? Improve this question. Roya 3, 3 3 gold badges 15 15 silver badges 38 38 bronze badges. Peter Peter 81 1 1 gold badge 1 1 silver badge 2 2 bronze badges. Add a comment. Active Oldest Votes.
0コメント